{"id":331,"date":"2019-02-07T07:40:50","date_gmt":"2019-02-07T06:40:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ssad.statistics.sk\/SSaD\/index.php\/pre-autorov-2-copy\/"},"modified":"2024-10-15T14:25:06","modified_gmt":"2024-10-15T12:25:06","slug":"pre-recenzentov","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/ssad.statistics.sk\/SSaD\/index.php\/pre-recenzentov\/","title":{"rendered":"Pre recenzentov"},"content":{"rendered":"<section class=\"l-section wpb_row padding-top-pages height_auto\"><div class=\"l-section-h i-cf\"><div class=\"g-cols vc_row via_flex valign_top type_default stacking_default\"><div class=\"vc_col-sm-12 wpb_column vc_column_container\"><div class=\"vc_column-inner\"><div class=\"wpb_wrapper\"><div class=\"wpb_text_column\"><div class=\"wpb_wrapper\"><h2 class=\"page\">PUBLIKA\u010cN\u00c1 ETIKA RECENZENTOV<\/h2>\n<ul class=\"ethics\">\n<li>Recenzentov vedeck\u00fdch \u010dl\u00e1nkov odpor\u00fa\u010daj\u00fa redakcii \u010dlenovia redak\u010dnej rady. V\u00fdkonn\u00fd redaktor pri objedn\u00e1van\u00ed recenzn\u00fdch posudkov prihliada na to, aby recenzenti neboli z rovnak\u00e9ho pracoviska ako autori n\u00e1vrhov vedeck\u00fdch \u010dl\u00e1nkov.<\/li>\n<li>Recenzenti nesm\u00fa by\u0165 v konflikte z\u00e1ujmov s autormi a subjektmi financuj\u00facimi v\u00fdskum, ktor\u00fd je obsahom n\u00e1vrhov vedeck\u00fdch \u010dl\u00e1nkov. Recenzenti bezodkladne ozn\u00e1mia redakcii, \u010di m\u00f4\u017eu\/nem\u00f4\u017eu vypracova\u0165 recenzn\u00e9 posudky na predlo\u017een\u00e9 n\u00e1vrhy vedeck\u00fdch \u010dl\u00e1nkov v term\u00ednoch, ktor\u00e9 stanov\u00ed redakcia.<\/li>\n<li>Recenzent vypracuje recenzn\u00fd posudok a na po\u017eiadanie redakcie vypln\u00ed aj osobitn\u00fd dotazn\u00edk k recenzn\u00e9mu posudku. Vyjadruje sa v \u0148om ku kvalite, k originalite, invencii a pr\u00ednosu n\u00e1vrhu vedeck\u00e9ho \u010dl\u00e1nku. Recenzn\u00fd posudok a osobitn\u00fd dotazn\u00edk za\u0161le redakcii v ur\u010denom term\u00edne e-mailom a n\u00e1sledne obidva podp\u00edsan\u00e9 dokumenty doru\u010d\u00ed redakcii aj v listinnej forme.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Recenzenti hodnotia obsahov\u00fa i form\u00e1lnu str\u00e1nku predlo\u017een\u00fdch n\u00e1vrhov vedeck\u00fdch \u010dl\u00e1nkov.<\/strong> S\u00fa povinn\u00ed upozorni\u0165 na pr\u00edpadn\u00e9 odborn\u00e9 pochybenia autorov, ako aj \u010fal\u0161ie nedostatky n\u00e1vrhov vedeck\u00fdch \u010dl\u00e1nkov. Recenzenti taktie\u017e upozornia redakciu, ak zistia, \u017ee podobn\u00e9 vedeck\u00e9 \u010dl\u00e1nky boli u\u017e publikovan\u00e9 v in\u00fdch \u010dasopisoch alebo zborn\u00edkoch, resp. \u017ee autori v n\u00e1vrhoch vedeck\u00fdch \u010dl\u00e1nkov na podporu svojich tvrden\u00ed nepou\u017eili relevantn\u00e9 zdroje.<\/li>\n<li>Recenzn\u00fd posudok m\u00e1 by\u0165 nap\u00edsan\u00fd stru\u010dne, vecne a zrozumite\u013ene, ak je to mo\u017en\u00e9, s cie\u013eom pom\u00f4c\u0165 zlep\u0161i\u0165 v\u00fdsledn\u00fa verziu n\u00e1vrhu vedeck\u00e9ho \u010dl\u00e1nku po obsahovej i form\u00e1lnej str\u00e1nke. <strong>Ne\u017eiaduci je agres\u00edvny t\u00f3n recenzenta zneva\u017euj\u00faci autora, ako aj osobn\u00e1 kritika autora recenzentom.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>Recenzn\u00e9 posudky musia by\u0165 objekt\u00edvne a s\u00fa d\u00f4vern\u00e9. Redakcia ich anonymne (bez mien recenzentov) poskytuje v\u00fdlu\u010dne autorom n\u00e1vrhov vedeck\u00fdch \u010dl\u00e1nkov a \u010dlenom redak\u010dnej rady ako podklad na rozhodovanie o tom, \u010di n\u00e1vrh vedeck\u00e9ho \u010dl\u00e1nku m\u00f4\u017ee by\u0165 publikovan\u00fd v \u010dasopise.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"PUBLIKA\u010cN\u00c1 ETIKA RECENZENTOV Recenzentov vedeck\u00fdch \u010dl\u00e1nkov odpor\u00fa\u010daj\u00fa redakcii \u010dlenovia redak\u010dnej rady. V\u00fdkonn\u00fd redaktor pri objedn\u00e1van\u00ed recenzn\u00fdch posudkov prihliada na to, aby recenzenti neboli z rovnak\u00e9ho pracoviska ako autori n\u00e1vrhov vedeck\u00fdch \u010dl\u00e1nkov. Recenzenti nesm\u00fa by\u0165 v konflikte z\u00e1ujmov s autormi a subjektmi financuj\u00facimi v\u00fdskum, ktor\u00fd je obsahom n\u00e1vrhov vedeck\u00fdch \u010dl\u00e1nkov. Recenzenti bezodkladne ozn\u00e1mia redakcii, \u010di m\u00f4\u017eu\/nem\u00f4\u017eu...","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-331","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ssad.statistics.sk\/SSaD\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/331","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ssad.statistics.sk\/SSaD\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ssad.statistics.sk\/SSaD\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ssad.statistics.sk\/SSaD\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ssad.statistics.sk\/SSaD\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=331"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/ssad.statistics.sk\/SSaD\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/331\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4227,"href":"https:\/\/ssad.statistics.sk\/SSaD\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/331\/revisions\/4227"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ssad.statistics.sk\/SSaD\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=331"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}